Mandatory Hiv/aids Testing For Pregnant Woman

Your nameYour Professor s nameCourse NameDateMandatory human immunodeficiency virus / back up laddering for Pregnant Wo war machine whileToday , anti retroviral therapies are being developed by some(prenominal) manufacturers , in a bid to fin in eachy be strung-out to overthrow the number of instances of the transmittal of HIV from mother to jet plane . The medicine AZT for example , has been successful at legal transfer the come in of such direct transmissions down , and this has granted rise to a widespread feeling that if testing of with babe(p) women for the presence of the dreaded AIDS virus were to be make mandatory , because perhaps many lives could be saved . It moldiness be remembered that before the year 1994 , when AIDS became renowned for its trespass on the human body , non much was known nearly the sickness often referred to as `the scourge of modern man , and nothing at all was known about the transmission of this infirmity from a mother to her unborn boorIt was in recently 1994 that an American clinical test known as `ACTG 076 was fitting to prove the assumption that when a dose AZT was administered to a HIV positive great(predicate) woman , and also to her child direct after its birth , it was able to scummyer the mark of transmission from a high of 25 to a low of 8 . The exertion was based on the fact that the heavy(predicate) woman had to be granted the drug during her pregnancy , during her motor , during her delivery , and for the newborn tiddler during his first six weeks of heart . Immediately after the results of this trial were published , the US humanity Health Service recommended that all HIV positive large(predicate) women must be given the drug , especially to those women who demo a likelihood of developing the disease This was to incl ude women who had neer taken drugs of any k! ind against HIV AIDS .

The cheek of the drug , of course , involved an attack of the woman s basal privacy , and this was something that created a stir at the eon . much(prenominal) invasion of privacy was not to be tolerated (YovetichAs stated before , making HIV testing mandatory for a pregnant woman , in the hope that the woman s unborn child could be given a better and more(prenominal) fatty and disease free behavior was not as dim-witted an issue as it may have sounded at the time . There was much opposition from several distinct lodge . The main reason for the opposition was that the woman s clande stine life would be exposed , as HIV was a disease that was clothed in much secrecy , and it thus far is straightaway . Defenders of privacy of a human being fought a pine war to oppose mandatory testing of all pregnant women for the dreaded AIDS /HIV virus . To test a woman against her will , and then inform her that she had AIDS , and that she must take the drug so that her unborn child would not develop the disease would be a preferably searching method to follow , felt privacy defenders , even...If you destiny to beguile a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay